Aarvion

Credit approval workflow built on your delegated authority

Aarvion checks every approval against your bank's delegated authority matrix, by exposure and grade, so each request goes to someone allowed to approve it. The approver records the outcome, rationale, conditions and, for committees, the voting members. After approval, closing terms are checked against what was approved.

Aarvion decision screen showing a loan request routed to credit committee with exposure, worst grade, outcome, conditions and voting members

What is delegated lending authority?

Delegated lending authority is the set of limits a lender's board approves for who can say yes to a loan. A typical matrix gives a relationship manager a small amount of authority, a credit officer more, a senior credit officer more again, and sends the largest or weakest requests to a credit committee or the board credit committee. Limits usually depend on total exposure to the relationship and the risk grade.

The matrix exists so that the size and risk of a decision match the experience of the person making it. It only works if every request is routed correctly and the decision is recorded.

Where credit approval workflows break

Approval often depends on someone working out the right approver by hand. Relationship exposure has to be added up across facilities, and the worst grade identified. Requests go out by email, conditions get written into one version of the memo and not another, and committee votes are recorded in minutes that live apart from the file.

  • Exposure is aggregated by hand, so routing can be wrong
  • Approvals are given on stale grades or outdated terms
  • Conditions and votes are scattered across emails and minutes
  • Approved terms are not checked against the signed agreement

How Aarvion routes and records approvals

Aarvion loads your delegated authority matrix, for example RM delegated authority, credit officer, senior credit officer, credit committee and board credit committee, with limits by maximum exposure and worst grade. Each request is checked against it and routed to the right level. Approval requires a current risk grade assignment, so a request cannot be approved on a grade that no longer reflects the file.

The approver records the outcome, the rationale and any conditions. For committee decisions, the voting members are recorded too. At closing, Aarvion compares the approved terms, the executed terms in the signed agreement and the proposed booking terms. Missing terms and material variances block confirmation until someone resolves them, and then booking in the core is verified.

What stays with your approvers

Aarvion does not approve loans. It checks who is allowed to, routes the request, and records what they decided. Approvers and committees keep full control of the decision, the conditions and the structure.

Every AI action is checked against your bank's own credit rules: allowed, held for the right signer, blocked, or all AI stopped. Every decision is recorded with who proposed it, which rule applied, who approved it and when.

How approval fits the full loan lifecycle

Approval sits between the credit memo and closing. Upstream, the memo, the spread and the risk grade give the approver what they need. Downstream, approved terms are checked at closing and carried into servicing and covenant tracking.

Aarvion is built for credit teams at banks, credit unions and commercial lenders. It works alongside your existing loan platform and core banking system. A 90-day pilot on one workflow and one loan segment is the usual starting point.

Approvals & authority: common questions

Can Aarvion use our bank's own authority matrix?

Yes. Aarvion loads your delegated authority levels and limits, for example by maximum exposure and worst grade. Each request is checked against your matrix, not a generic one.

Does Aarvion approve loans?

No. People approve loans. Aarvion checks that the approver has authority, routes the request and records the outcome, rationale, conditions and voting members.

What happens if the risk grade changes before approval?

The grade assignment goes stale when the financials, terms, evidence or debt schedule change. Approval requires a current assignment, so the reviewer must refresh it first.

How are committee decisions recorded?

The committee's outcome, rationale, conditions and voting members are recorded with the request. That record stays with the loan for later review.

Does it check closing documents against the approval?

Yes. Aarvion compares approved, executed and proposed booking terms. Missing terms and material variances block confirmation, then booking in the core is verified.

A busy production line

Your borrowers keep building.
Keep up with them.